Historia wymaga pasterzy, nie rzeźników.

Liebcrson Slaniey (1985). Mukmy, It Ciwnt: The
Imprimment o f Sociul Reseurch and Theory, Berkeley:
Uniyersity 01'Calilornia Press.
— (1992). Siiiall N'•i (ind BIK Conclusioiis, „Social Forces". 70 (2), 307-320.
Linton Raiph (1936). Tlie Smdy (if Mdii. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Liska Allcn E. (1981), Perspeclives nn Deyiunce, Englewood Clil'ls, NJ; Prentice-
Hall. Long Larry (1988). Mif;i'<iliiin (ind Residciiluil Mnhility iii llie United
Stałeś, New York; Russel Sagę. Luhlliann Nikłaś (1982), The Differenluilniii iif
Saciety, ttum. S. Holmes, C. Larmore, New York: Columbia
University Press.
Luker Kristen (1984). Ałmrtinii und the Polilics ofMnIherlnmd. Berkeley:
University of California Press. Malthu.s Thoinas R. (1798) [1926], First I-JSIIY 1111
P<ipiil(iti«n, New York: Kelley; wyd. poi.: Prawo ludności,
pr/.cł. A. Kry.yżanowski. Gehetneri Wolff, Warszawa 1925. Marsden Peter. Nan
Lin (1980). Sociul Slriiclure iiiid Nelwdrk Audłysis. Newbiiry Park, CA: Sagę. Marx
KarI (1867) [1967], Ciipiltil: A Crilifiil Aniiłysis iif Ciipilulisi Prwiuctiiiii, New
York: International
Publishers: wyd. poi.: Kupitiif. Krytyku ekiiiKiinii pulitycwej, KiW, Warszawa, t.
l — 1950; t. 2 — 1955;
t.3 — 1957, 1959:t. 4— 1960, 1963.1966. Marx KarI, Fridrich Engels (1846) [
1947], The Gerniun IdenloKy. New York: Iniernalional Publishers.
— (1848) [ 1978] Tlić Ciiiiiiiniilisi Mullifrsio. s. 469-500 w: Robert Tucker(red.).
Tlie Mury — Kn^els Reuder,
New York: Norlon; wyd. poi.: Munifest kiiiiiunisłyc^.iiy, przeł. l. Koherdowa,
KiW, Warszawa 1969. Maryanski Alexandra, lonathan H. Tunier (1991). Netwurk
Aniilysis, w: J.H. Turncr (1991), Tlie Striicture of Soriiiliiffirtil Tlietiry, Belinont,
CA: Wadsworth.
— (1992), Tlie Socnil Ciii^e: Hiiniiin Nulure iiiid the Evotiition ofSociety,
Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press. McCarthy John, Mayer Zald (1977), Resource Mohiliwtion und Sociul
Movements, „American Journal of
Sociology". 82 (6), 1212-1241.
McKenzie Rodcrick (1933), 77ic Metropolituit Community, New York: McGraw-
Hill. McPherson, J. Miller (1981), A Dynamie Model iif Yolinilliry Affiliulioii.
„Social Forces", 59, 705-728.
— (1983), An Eciiliixy (ifAffiliiilinn, „American Sociological Review", 48. 519-
532.
— (1988), A Tlieory of VoJttntury OrffUlliMtiiin, s. 42-76 w: C. Milofsky (red.),
Community Organiz.utidiis, New York: Oxford.
222
 
— (1990), Evtiltiti<m in Commiinities of Voluntary Orf,aiw.u<ums, s. 224-245
w: Ji Hendra Singh (red.),
Orifiiiii7.tilin/iti! Evolution. Newhiiry Park, CA: Sagę.
Mead George Hcrherl (1934), Mincl. Self. tiiul Sucieły. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press: wyd. poi.: Umysł. osobliwość i spolei:r.eiisl\rn. przet. Z. Woliriska,
PWN. Warszawa 1975.
— (1938), PliiIi.miJliy of llie ArI. Chicago: University ol' Chicago Press. Mehaii
Hugh. Houston Wood (1975), Tlić Reality <if Etiiiiomelodolo^y, New York: Wiley.
Menard Seolt W., Elizabelh W. Moen (1987). Perspeclives iifPopiiIiilnin, New
York: Oxford University Press. Merton Roheil K. (1949). Disrniiiiiiulinn iiiid llie
Aniericcin Creed, w: R.H. Maclver (red.), Discrimination (ind Nutioiidl Welfare.
New York: Harper & Rów.
— (1957), Role-Sel: Pruhleiiis iii Sin 'mln^iciil Tlieory, „British Journal of
Sociology", 8. 106-120.
— (1968). Sucidl Theory iiiid Sociiil Struclure, New York: Free Press; wyd.
poi.: Temiu socjologiczna
i slriiklum społeczni. przeł. E. Morawska, J. Wertcnslein-Żutawski, PWN,
Warszawa 1982.
Merti.mRobcrtK.,MlccK.Rris»(\951}.Ciii!lril)iitioiisKiflie7'lieiiryofReferenceGriiii
pBeh(ivior. w. R.K. Mer-lon, Siicial Theory tinil Sociiil Strucliire. New York: Free
Press.
—(1968). Conliiiilities iii IheTlieoryof ReferenceGrolipsund Sociiil Structure,w.
R.K. Merton, Sociul Thenry
tiud Social Slriicliire. New York: Free Press. Meyer Jolin W. (1977), Tlić Effects
of Ediicutiim us ciii Institution, „American Joumal of Sociology", 83 (l),
55-77. Mills C. Wright (1956), The Pnwer Elitę. New York: Oxford Univeristy
Press; wyd. poi.: Elitu wtadz.y, oprać.
i red. J. Rafelski, KiW, Warszawa 1961.
—(1959), Sucioloyiciil liiiin;imitioii, New York: Oxford University Press.
Miyainolo Frank S. (1970), Self. Moln-iilion. (indSyniholic Interaction Theory. s.
271 -285, w: T. Shibutani (red.),
HtiiiKin Naturę und Ci>llecli\'e Beh(i\'uir. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Monuy Jolin, Anke Ehrhardt (1972), Mdii inul Wonuin. Boy iiiid Girl, Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press. Murdock Georgc P. (1949). Sin iiil Sluictiire.
New York: Macmillan.
—(1965), Culture nnd Sliricly, Piltsburgh: Universily of Pittsburgh Press. Nadel
S.F. (1957), The Sludy ojSociciI Slriicliire, London: Cohen and West. Niebuhr
Richard (1929), Tlić Suriiil 'iiilirces tif Deniiiiiiiwtiiiiullisni. New York: Holt.
Nisbet Rohcrt A. (1966), The Stiritiliif;n'nl Trciditiiiii. New York: Basie Books.
— (1969), Sliridl Chun^c iiiid History, New York: Oxford University Press.
NORC (1982), Prestiże RdiikiiiKS. Chicago: Nalional Opinion Research Center.
Pareto Vilfredo (1916) [1935], Trealise im Gcneral S<ici(il(i(;y, New York:
Harcourt, Brace, pod tytułem: The
Mind iiii(l Sudety. Park Robert E. (1916), The City: Siif;f;esti<ins for flie
lnveslif;fitinn ofHiimun Behavit>r m im Urban Enyironment,
..Ainerican Journal of Sociology", 20, 577-612.
— (1936), HLIIIIIIII Eciilii^y. .,Ainerican Journal of Sociology". 42. 1-15. Park
Robert E., Ernest W. Burgess (1925), The Cny, Chicago: University of Chicago
Press. ParkinsonC. Northcote (1957), Plirkiiisiin 's IMH: Boston: Houghton-MiffIin:
wyd. poi.: Prawo Parkinsona ulbo
w pDKiini :.u postępem, przet. J. Kydryriski. KiW, Warszawa 1963. Parsons
Talcott (1951). The Soridl System. New York: Free Press.
— (1953). A Re\'ised Aiiiilyliriil Approurli tu tlie Theory of Strutificution, w: R.
Bendix i S.M. Lipset (red.), Cliiss. Stdtu',. (ind Pimer. New York: Free Press.
— (1966). Soricties: E\'(iliiliiinurv iiiid Ciiiiipiiriilive Perspeeli\'es, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
— (1971), The System nf Miidern Smieties, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Perrow Charles (1967), A Frumework for the Comp(irutive Analysis
ofOr{i,uniuiSwns, „American Sociological Review",32, 194-208.